Project and content management for Contemporary Authors volumes
WORK TITLE: Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I
WORK NOTES:
PSEUDONYM(S):
BIRTHDATE:
WEBSITE:
CITY:
STATE:
COUNTRY:
NATIONALITY:
http://www.hood.edu/Academics/Departments/English/Faculty/Trevor-Dodman.html * http://www.bsls.ac.uk/reviews/modern-and-contemporary/trevor-dodman-shell-shock-memory-and-the-novel-in-the-wake-of-world-war-i/
RESEARCHER NOTES:
LC control no.: n 2015023442
LCCN Permalink: https://lccn.loc.gov/n2015023442
HEADING: Dodman, Trevor
000 00349cz a2200109n 450
001 9832809
005 20150415114211.0
008 150415n| azannaabn |n aaa
010 __ |a n 2015023442
040 __ |a DLC |b eng |e rda |c DLC
100 1_ |a Dodman, Trevor
670 __ |a Shell shock, memory, and the novel in the wake of World War I, 2015: |b ECIP t.p. (Trevor Dodman, Hood College)
PERSONAL
Male.
EDUCATION:Dartmouth College, A.B.; Carleton University, M.A.; Boston College, Ph.D.
ADDRESS
CAREER
Writer and academic. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, on staff, worked for two years; Hood College, Frederick, MD, on staff, beginning 2009, then associate professor of English. Taught English as a Second Language (ESL) in Japan for a year and a half.
AVOCATIONS:International film, contemporary Canadian fiction, and children’s literature.
WRITINGS
Contributor to academic journals.
SIDELIGHTS
Trevor Dodman is an academic and a writer. After earning degrees from Dartmouth College and Carleton University, he completed a Ph.D. from Boston College. He taught English as a Second Language (ESL) in Japan for a year and a half and worked in the English Department at Wake Forest University for two years before joining the faculty at Hood College in 2009, where he eventually became an associate professor of English. Dodman’s academic research interests include British literature since the nineteenth century, studies on the novel, genocide studies, war literature, and transatlantic modernism. He has published articles in academic journals on the topics of violence, masculinity, trauma, and collective memory. In an article on the Hood College Blog, Dodman shared: “I am drawn to new historicist and cultural studies methodologies, as well as critical theorizing about the development and circulation of gender, race, and class constructions.”
Dodman published his first book, Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I, in 2015. The account looks at the representations of shell shock in wartime and postwar novels by numerous authors, including Mulk Raj Anand, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Mary A. Ward, George Washington Lee, Ford Madox Ford, Christopher Isherwood, and Ernest Hemingway. (“Shell shock” is now commonly called posttraumatic stress disorder, or PTSD.) The account insists that World War I-era novels provide an important source for the study of shell shock and its practices of commemoration. Dodman shows that these authors write survivors into their novels, making them visible to the public, and illustrate their wounds, in contrast to the vision of the heroic soldier seemingly unscathed by wartime trauma. The book also looks at collective memory and the way shell shock shapes views and memories of World War I.
Writing on the British Society for Literature and Science Web site, Rachel Murray found that the writing on shell-shocked sepoys is “the most groundbreaking material” in Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I. Murray admitted that “there are, however, a few instances where the explanation of shell shock could have been opened out more effectively.” She explained that “despite taking the stance that shell shock affected men alone, … the chapters on Ward and Hemingway reveal the ways in which the condition impacted all who came into contact with it irrespective of gender. Adorno’s diagnosis of postwar society in Minima Moralia (1951) as suffering from a kind of collective shell shock would perhaps have been useful here.” Nevertheless, Murray concluded that “these are minor discrepancies, however, amid a rich and thought-provoking study that is bursting with ideas and insights.”
BIOCRIT
PERIODICALS
Choice, April 1, 2016, B. Adler, review of Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I, p. 1165.
ONLINE
British Society for Literature and Science, http://www.bsls.ac.uk/ (July 26, 2016), Rachel Murray, review of Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I.
Hood College Blog, http://blog.hood.edu/ (April 27, 2017), “English Professor Publishes Book on WWI Shell Shock.”
Hood College Web site, http://www.hood.edu/ (April 27, 2017), author faculty profile.*
Trevor Dodman
Associate Professor of English
Tel: 301-696-3739
Email: dodman@hood.edu
Office: Rosenstock Hall, Room 209
Office hours: By appointment
Education
Ph.D., Boston College
M.A., Carleton University
A.B., Dartmouth College
Biography
I teach courses exploring British literature of the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. Additional teaching areas of interest include transatlantic modernism, the novel, war literature, genocide studies and composition. My current book project reads British and American shell shock novels in the company of diverse texts from the World War I era, including medical studies, hospital records, regimental histories, trench newspapers, mass media accounts, battlefield guidebooks and physical memorial spaces.
I am drawn to new historicist and cultural studies methodologies, as well as critical theorizing about the development and circulation of gender, race and class constructions. In published articles I explore issues related to trauma, violence, masculinity and collective memory. Before arriving at Hood College in the fall of 2009, I taught for two years in the English department at Wake Forest University; before pursuing my graduate work, I taught ESL in Japan for a year and a half. Outside interests include international film, contemporary Canadian fiction and children’s literature.
English Professor Publishes Book on WWI Shell Shock
Trevor Dodman, associate professor of English, recently published a book about shell shock during and following World War I.
“Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I” explores British and American shell shock novels in the company of diverse texts from the World War I era, including medical studies, hospital records, regimental histories, trench newspapers, mass media accounts, battlefield guidebooks and physical memorial spaces.
Dodman said the book argues that World War I novels serve as an untapped source of information about shell shock, and it renews the present understanding of the condition by exploring the nexus of shell shock and practices of commemoration. Shell shock novelists testify to the tenaciousness and complexity of the disorder, write survivors into visibility and articulate the immediacy of wounds that remain to be seen. It aims to help readers understand more fully the extent to which shell shock continues to shape and trouble modern memories of World War I.
Dodman teaches Hood College courses exploring British literature of the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. His additional teaching areas of interest include transatlantic modernism, the novel, war literature, genocide studies and composition.
“I am drawn to new historicist and cultural studies methodologies, as well as critical theorizing about the development and circulation of gender, race and class constructions,” he said. “In published articles I explore issues related to trauma, violence, masculinity and collective memory.”
Before arriving at Hood College in the fall 2009, he taught for two years in the English department at Wake Forest University. He also taught ESL in Japan for a year and a half, and he earned his doctorate from Boston College.
Watch a video interview with Dodman below.
Dodman, Trevor. Shell shock, memory, and
the novel in the wake of World War I
B. Adler
CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries.
53.8 (Apr. 2016): p1165.
Source Citation (MLA 8
th Edition)
Adler, B. "Dodman, Trevor. Shell shock, memory, and the novel in the wake of World War I." CHOICE:
Current Reviews for Academic Libraries, Apr. 2016, p. 1165+. Book Review Index Plus,
go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?
p=BRIP&sw=w&u=schlager&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CA449661525&it=r&asid=a6282584a5d69adcb190716a00078b17.
Accessed 11 Mar. 2017.
Gale Document Number: GALE|A449661525
Trevor Dodman, Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I
Trevor Dodman, Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I (New York: Cambridge University Press 2015) 256pp. Hb, £64.99, PDF $80. ISBN: 978-1107114203
‘There is never a single approach to something remembered’, writes John Berger in About Looking (1980). ‘Numerous approaches or stimuli converge upon and lead to it’ (qtd. 1). Berger’s quotation provides a fitting epigraph to Trevor Dodman’s wide-ranging and stimulating survey of shell shock in the modern novel, which draws on numerous critical approaches – including gender studies, transnationalism, new historicism and queer theory – to represent the diversity of a disorder that ‘chooses all kinds of people in its crippling passage’ (Jay Winters, qtd. 114).
In its emphasis on the ‘narrative traces, subaltern faces, and commemorative spaces of shell shock’ (9), this new study consolidates and expands existing contributions to the field, such as Trudi Tate’s Modernism, History and the First World War (1998), Santanu Das’s Touch and Intimacy in First World War Literature (2005) and Wyatt Bonikowski’s Shell Shock and the Modernist Imagination (2013). Dodman adopts a refreshing approach by examining canonical studies of shell shock in relation to more marginal textual representations, positioning novels by Ford Madox Ford, Ernest Hemingway, and F. Scott Fitzgerald alongside ‘“lost” shell shock novels” (5) by writer and activist Mary Augusta Ward, African-American novelist George Washington Lee, Indian author Mulk Raj Anand, and queer writer Christopher Isherwood.
Throughout the study, Dodman juxtaposes literary texts with a range of non-literary sources – medical studies, army reports, propaganda, even battlefield guidebooks – exploring the ways in which shell shock was suppressed by official accounts and contained within official narratives. These attempts at suppression are particularly revealing when juxtaposed with fictional representations of the disorder, with Dodman exploring the ways in which the novelistic depictions of shell shock can provide a more truthful account than their non-fictional counterparts. The first chapter, for instance, focuses on the disparity between Ward’s war propaganda, in which she advocates a narrow and oppressive vision of masculinity, and wartime novels such as Missing (1917) and Harvest (1920), in which she allows for ‘a continuum of masculinities that her propaganda refuses to consider’ (27).
Fascinatingly, Dodman also highlights the ways in which, alongside their ‘efforts to represent radical disruptions to the human subject’ (10), his chosen novelists remain attuned to the need of the shell-shocked subject to contain and give shape to their experiences. In Ford’s tetralogy Parade’s End (1924-28), which provides the focus of the second chapter, Christopher’s Tietjens’s writing of a sonnet functions as a ‘tightly controlled linguistic shell’ in which Tietjens is able to ‘direct his nervous energies and memories in need of containment’ (71). Similarly, although Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms (1929) ‘testifies to the persistence of wounds, both visible and invisible’ (83), the first-person narration of protagonist Frederic Henry ‘enacts a kind of prosthetic thinking’ (84) designed to reunify a self that has been left both physically and mentally disarticulated by war.
The desire for containment is consistent with the attempts of the U. S. War Department to pre-empt and subsequently smooth over instances of shell shock in returning soldiers. In one of the most compelling chapters of the study, Dodman reveals how the experiences of African-American soldiers were systematically elided from medico-military reports and media outlets, their trauma explained away by the erroneous belief that ‘“blackness” leaves one predisposed to madness’ (122). The fourth chapter opens with an incisive close reading of Toni Morrison’s novel Sula (1973), in which a black World War I veteran finds himself in hospital, and glances down at a neatly divided meal tray in front of him: ‘Confined, contained, and balanced’, Dodman notes, ‘the colored foods maintain a segregated distance’ (112). Over the course of the chapter, Dodman demonstrates how Lee’s novel River George (1937) subverts this dynamic of containment by refusing to confine the suffering of its protagonist, Aaron George, to his experiences on the frontline. Instead, Lee highlights the various resonances between shell shock and the pervasive trauma of racialised identity in post-war, Jim Crow America.
Indeed, the most groundbreaking material of the study focuses on the devastating effects of shell shock on ‘the most marginalised of all wounded’ (19). In his chapter on Anand’s Trilogy (1939-42), Dodman examines the plight of shell-shocked sepoys, the term given to Indian soldiers who served under British rule. Dodman argues that the sepoy ‘suffers from a terrible double-bind’ (158) – just as British officers refused to recognise his shell shock, he himself often failed to acknowledge it due to having been instilled with an entrenched, hyper-masculine caste identity. The coda to the study also examines the ways in which shell shock interacted with the perceived malady of homosexuality in the interwar period, exploring the predicament of the queer subject in Isherwood’s The Memorial (1932) of remaining closeted after being broken open by war. The chapter draws to a close with a fascinating account of what E. M. Forster refers to as the ‘opening out’ (qtd. 203) of narrative, raising the possibility that the breaching of borders enacted by the trauma of World War I may have contributed to explosive social change. It is a fitting conclusion to a study that opens up a range of possibilities for future studies of shell shock.
There are, however, a few instances where the explanation of shell shock could have been opened out more effectively. Dodman rightly argues that in being the product of a particular historical moment (7) shell shock must be distinguished from other traumatic disorders such as PTSD; the term itself, however, is not unpacked until halfway through the text, when he explains that it was ‘a much-contested umbrella term that arbitrarily covered a host of competing disorders’ (117). Moreover, despite taking the stance that shell shock affected men alone (15), the chapters on Ward and Hemingway reveal the ways in which the condition impacted all who came into contact with it irrespective of gender. Adorno’s diagnosis of post-war society in Minima Moralia (1951) as suffering from a kind of collective shell shock would perhaps have been useful here. These are minor discrepancies, however, amid a rich and thought-provoking study that is bursting with ideas and insights.
Rachel Murray, University of Bristol